Search for: "Mitsubishi Electric US Holdings, Inc."
Results 1 - 20
of 27
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2012, 1:18 pm
In the Order, ALJ Shaw granted a consent motion filed by Respondents Mitsubishi Electric US Holdings, Inc. [read post]
4 Jun 2012, 9:48 pm
According to the Notice of Investigation, the ITC has identified the following respondents in this investigation: LG Electronics, Inc., of the Republic of Korea; LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, NJ; Mitsubishi Electric Corp. of Japan; Mitsubishi Electric US Holdings, Inc., of Cypress, CA; Mitsubishi Electric and Electronics USA, Inc., of Vernon Hills, IL; Mitsubishi… [read post]
3 May 2012, 2:45 pm
Patent Nos. 6,701,523 (the ‘523 patent), 6,898,762 (the ‘762 patent), 7,065,709 (the ‘709 patent), 7,103,906 (the ‘906 patent), 7,225,455 (the ‘455 patent), 7,493,643 (the ‘643 patent), and 8,112,776 (the ‘776 patent) (collectively, the “asserted patents”): LG Electronics, Inc. of South Korea LG Electronics U.S.A., Inc. of Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey Mitsubishi Electric Corp. of Japan Mitsubishi… [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 10:38 am
See Johnson Worldwide Assocs., Inc. v. [read post]
14 Dec 2022, 1:53 am
., Mitsubishi Electric Corporation, Siemens Aktiengesellschaft, SK Telecom Co., Ltd., Technology in Ariscale, LLC, Telefónica S.A., TIM S.p.A., Wilus Inc., Wireless Innovations, LLC and Sisvel [with respect to the patents that have been assigned to it]. [read post]
30 Jul 2011, 10:12 am
Dynegy Holdings Inc., C.A. [read post]
2 Mar 2009, 11:57 am
Mitsubishi Digital Electronics America, Inc., 578 F.Supp.2d 1229, 1238 (C.D. [read post]
2 Jul 2013, 1:39 pm
And consumers are saving, because wind power holds down the overall cost of electricity on fixed-price contracts. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
General Electric appealed the decision of the United States International Trade Commission, holding that certain variable-speed wind turbines imported by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. did not violate section 337 of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. [read post]
10 Jul 2012, 7:49 am
General Electric appealed the decision of the United States International Trade Commission, holding that certain variable-speed wind turbines imported by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd. and Mitsubishi Power Systems Americas, Inc. did not violate section 337 of the Tariff Act, 19 U.S.C. [read post]
21 May 2010, 1:26 pm
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2009, 1:35 pm
Tendler, formerly a patent lawyer for Mitsubishi Electric Research Labs. [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
8 Mar 2010, 4:36 pm
United States (Copyright Litigation Blog) (Property, intangible) US Trade Marks – Decisions Precedential No. 7: TTAB deems internet printouts admissible via notice of reliance: Safer, Inc v OMS Investments, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB vacates 2008 fraud ruling in Herbaceuticals, Inc v Xel Pharmaceuticals, Inc (TTABlog) TTAB affirms 2(d) refusal of CARMINE’S design for restaurant services in view of two other CARMINE’S designs: In re… [read post]
2 Aug 2012, 9:55 am
Here are the noteworthy trade secret, non-compete and cybersecurity stories from the past week: Noteworthy Trade Secret and Non-Compete Posts and Cases: Mitsubishi Electric & Electronics USA Inc. has persuaded a trial court to set aside a $124 million jury verdict against it arising from Grail Semiconductor Inc.'s claims that Mitsubishi breached a non-disclosure agreement by disclosing confidential information for a memory chip… [read post]
26 Sep 2010, 10:08 pm
WM Wrigley (Peter Zura’s 271 Patent Blog) District Court E D Texas: Domestic use of foreign product manufactured using patented method is not an act of infringement: Input/Output, Inc. et al v. [read post]
18 Jan 2010, 3:34 am
USPTO to hold public meeting on January 20th to discuss appeals rules changes (Patent Docs) Was the Federal Circuit feeling guilty over KSR? [read post]
16 Jan 2011, 7:36 am
(see chart below World Wide Ownership of US Patents 2010) Top-50 US Patent Assignees in 2010 (As reported by IFI) International Business Machines Corp 5896 Samsung Electronics Co Ltd (Korea) 4551 Microsoft Corp 3094 Canon K K (Japan) 2552 Panasonic Corp (Japan) 2482 Toshiba Corp (Japan) 2246 Sony Corp (Japan) 2150 Intel Corp 1653 LG Electronics Inc (Korea) 1490 Hewlett-Packard Development Co L P 1480 Hitachi Ltd (Japan) 1460 … [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents - Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology - ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation concerning Carsem's importation and… [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 1:41 am
Group, Inc v Jungle Networks, Inc (Gray on Claims) BPAI holds term indefinite and summarizes reasoning behind broadest reasonable interpretation rule: Ex parte Senju Metal Industry Co (Gray on Claims) US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Amkor Technology – ITC issues supplemental initial determination finding non-invalidity under 35 USC §§ 102(g) and 103(a) of certain asserted patent claims in investigation… [read post]
